Is Francis's Stigmata an example of a miracle or is it false? Think about your answer and give the opposite response

It is a false assertion because there is no way a human can get injuries without having some physical interaction with his/her surrounding.  Still, a stigmata is something we read and hear about.  As a person who believes in science, in proofs and in eye witness I think that this kind of stories will just confuse people and leave them unstable.  Myths are created by stories that appear obscure and unreasonable.  A temporal definition of truth is: reality exposed by the being that agrees with the present facts (internal or external) plus one or several imposition aim.  It might or it might not have an aim but it might only be ego.  Truth is only what humans live by their own and until nothing supernatural occurs to them myths will be unreal.  For the same reason I believe only in experience and logical explanations.  I cannot speak clearly about this subject for the same reason that it is something subjective.  Maybe someone invented the story which became a legend, then a myth, a passion, and  the passion a later becomes a stigmata that will later go back to a myth.  Another probable explanation is that some bad people inflicted the stigmata to him and for his passion, faith and devotion, Saint Francis did not spoke about them.  After this, the people inspired for his relationship to Jesus Christ wrote that his wounds had appeared magically.